Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 10 results ...
Şevik, S, Koçer, A, İnce, H and Tombuş, F E (2022) Determination of optimum tilt angle of the solar collector and evaluation of the position of the existing buildings in terms of solar potential. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 812–28.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Solar collector; PV panel; optimum tilt angle; building stock positioning; solar potential;
- ISBN/ISSN: 1745-2007
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2021.1926899
- Abstract:
This study aims to determine the optimum tilt angle of the solar collector or PV for the province of Çorum, Turkey, and evaluate the existing 2019 building stocks in ten neighborhoods in terms of solar potential. The optimum collector tilt angle was obtained between 15° and 56° for six-month periods, it was calculated as 63°, 24°, 7°, and 49° for seasonal (winter, spring, summer, autumn) periods, respectively, and according to these values, the optimum solar radiation values were found for tilt angles. The annual optimum tilt angle for Çorum was found to be 34°±1; however, it was calculated that the optimum tilt angles during the year could vary between 1° and 67°. These results show that positioning the solar collectors/PVs at the optimum tilt angle, adjusting the tilt angle once a month or at least twice a year, or using solar tracking systems provide significant efficiency gains for optimum benefit. Based on the calculations made with azimuth angles, it was determined that 60% of the sampling buildings were positioned to benefit from sunlight during the day, and 10% of them are partially positioned, and thus, these buildings contribute to decarbonization. For this reason, it has been determined that the existing building stocks in Çorum province are highly suitable for low-cost roof installations and the construction of future buildings according to the locations determined in this study will increase thermal comfort. Although this study is mainly focused on local interest, it can be adapted to the general.
Engebø, A, Klakegg, O J, Lohne, J, Bohne, R A, Fyhn, H and Lædre, O (2022) High-performance building projects: how to build trust in the team. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 774–90.
Globa, A, Costin, G, Tokede, O, Wang, R, Khoo, C K and Moloney, J (2022) Hybrid kinetic facade: fabrication and feasibility evaluation of full-scale prototypes. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 791–811.
Goncikowski, M (2022) The tactics of illumination of high-rise buildings in the cities skyline. Research by design on Skyreach tower skyscraper in Warsaw. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 870–93.
Maleki, B, Casanovas-Rubio, M d M and Fuente Antequera, A d l (2022) Sustainability assessment in residential high-rise building design: state of the art. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 927–40.
Mangkuto, R A and Paramita, B (2022) Computation of the greenery-sky-view factor in daylit buildings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 850–69.
Sadooghi, P and Kherani, N P (2022) Influence of metallo-dielectric optical properties on thermal resistance and solar heat gain coefficient of multi-pane glazing systems in hot and cold climates. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 894–910.
Singer, H and Özşahin, & (2022) Prioritization of laminate flooring selection criteria from experts’ perspectives: a spherical fuzzy AHP-based model. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 911–26.
Valitabar, M, GhaffarianHoseini, A, GhaffarianHoseini, A and Attia, S (2022) Advanced control strategy to maximize view and control discomforting glare: a complex adaptive façade. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 829–49.
Zami, M S (2022) Barriers hindering acceptance of earth construction in the urban context of the United Kingdom. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 941–58.